The Ceasefire: Between Survival and Loss
Mohammad al-Zaqzouq
We were completely engrossed in a card game, sitting in front of one of the houses that had
electricity in the evening, when one of the neighbors told us the news about the ceasefire. He
said it would come into effect the next day around noon. We all looked up: those who were
absorbed in the game, and those who were sitting nearby, watching. Everyone looked up for a
moment—and then, somehow, we just went back to playing cards.
In the previous wars, news like that would have set off chanting and cheering on the streets of
Gaza: the chants of people who had escaped death after days of ferocious fighting. This time,
it wasn’t even exciting enough to stop a group of men from playing cards. The news had
come at a time when the very idea of a ceasefire—as a gateway to safety, to salvation—had
lost its meaning. It came after two years of relentless murder and harrowing devastation, after
bereavement had entered everyone’s lives. I would even venture to say that there is nobody in
Gaza who has not lost, at the very least, five people from their inner circle; not to mention the
fact that almost everybody, apart from a tiny fraction of people living in al-Wusta, has lost
their homes. And so, what does it mean for the war to end now, after loss has gotten the best
of us all?
What kind of meaning can be created from having escaped death after such a monstrou

